
[Home] [Articles] [A/V Clips] [Biography] [Contacts] [Discography] [einstein] |
[Forward] [Gear] [Links] [Merchandise] [News] [Photos] [Q&A] [Transcriptions] |
TALKING DRUMS |
by Stan Hall |
Summer '96 |
When
last we saw Jonathan Mover he was planning to put together his own band, Einstein
(see cover story in TD #6). Now, two years later, the group's finally about to see the
light of day, and in a very big way. Joe Satriani, with whom Jonathan is currently
touring, will headline a guitar extravaganza that will roll its rock across America for
five weeks in late summer. Joe has given Einstein the opening slot in the multi-act show,
which means Mover will do double duty, warming up the crowd with his trio and then closing
it with Satriani, whose road band also includes his lonq time session drummer Jeff
Campitelli on rhythm guitar, keyboards, and percussion. This, then, is the story of how
Jonathan Mover put together and launched a band. Big deal, you say, he's got a name, he
should have no problem. Well, does the cautionary tale of Missing Persons ring any bells?
In a lot of ways Mover's efforts echo Terry Bozzio's optimistic dreams of over a decade
ago when that drummer left the predictable path to put together his own band, Missing
Persons. Let's hope the world has become a better place since then and that history won't
repeat itself. It's been a long, arduous struggle, and Jonathan's had to put down his
sticks for a year and swap bass drums for business meetings, paradiddles for percentage
points, and cymbals for CD pressings. When you're a professional drummer, there's a lot
more to life than hot licks. The music business is just that, a business,and this is a
story not about the art of music but about the art of the deal. And make no mistake,
if there were no deal, there'd be no music.
Fest in the West
The best news of all
is we're wrapping up our distribution deal, so it should be in the stores by the middle of
the summer. That's perfect timing because August 1 through September 5 Joe is going across
the U.S. for five weeks with a guitar festival thing that he put together. It's kind of a
Lollapalooza of Guitarists. and we'll be doing mostly outdoor sheds. It'll be Joe
headlining; SteveVai; maybe Eric Johnson; possibly JohnMcLaughlin; and Einstein will open
the show. I kinda thought that was it, although we're still friendly, because he knew that I was totally focused on Einstein. But he telephoned back a few months later to see if I'd be available to tour, and I told him I'd like to come out and do as much as I can, but that I couldn't put my band off to go out for another whole year on the road - we started last October ('95) and we're ending in September of this year ('96). Around Christmas time, after we had done all of Europe and were getting ready to do Australia and New Zealand, his management asked me to continue Joe's tour through September, includingSouth America, the Pacific rim, the Far East, back to Europe, and more in theStates. At that point I said
I'd love to continue but I couldn't unless Einstein was involved in one way or another. I
didn't want to bring the band out immediately in February because it would've been too
difficult to get ready that quickly, and I didn't want to try to do a double bill without
having the CD pressed.
There's another way to do it, which is to hit the road yourself. A lot of new bands are starting to do that because the record companies just don't know what they're looking for; they're looking to jump on the newest Pearl Jam, so then a ton of Pearl Jams come out. Then they want a new Hootie and the Blowfish, so the new Hooties come out. But we're not similar to any of those bands. A lot of new bands
and many guys on the same level that I'm at - professional working musicians with
established names in the business - who want to do their own thing are not finding the
record companies paying too much attention unless they sound like Silverchair or the
flavor-of- the- week 15-year-old sloppy alternative band. So a lot of guys are doing it
themselves: selling their own CD's and hitting the road themselves. We had a really great
band open for us on the West Coast called the Mustard Seeds.That initially was Greg and
Matt Bissonette. Greg split for whatever reason - rnaybe because he was doing Toto last
year - and Matt kept it going, and they did their own CD and are selling it on the road.
It's going great, and hopefully when you do it that way, you'll generate enough attention
or sell enough copies that somebody will sign you. Usually you can get
a CD pressed for around $2 to $2.50 each when you get them done in quantities of a
thousand or more; there are many companies around the country that will do it that way.
Instead of going with a small - maybe too small - independent label that would not be able
to give us enough money to get us going and still want do a typical percentage point
structure, with my lawyer's help we decided to do our own label and then just go for
distribution.That way we get a much larger chunk of percentage and points to keep. It
means that we have to take the risk in the beginning, but the payoff will be greater in
the end.
Most bands that work with record companies have to do a publishing deal because publishing is where all the money's at. Everybody should know that by now, and every drummer should learn how to write music, one way or another, and have a piece of publishing. There's always that one guy in the band - usually the guitar player or the singer - who writes all the music, and at the end of a tour or the end of the year, that person does much better financially. While everybody else is scrambling to get their money together to buy an apartment because the record only sold 20,000 units, if it got a lot of radio play, he might be putting in a pool or buying his second condo. So learn how to write some music! [laughs] In doing a record
deal, most companies will ask for a 50-50 split or a 60-40 split. On one hand, they may
offer you $150.000 up front. but if you have a semi hit record then there's a lot more
than 150 grand coming in, and they're going to have a big piece of it. We didn't want to
do that; we wanted to retain all of our publishing, so we decided to do it this way first.
Those are pretty much the steps we've taken to this point. But that's the difference between the two: when you go for the record deal and they give you one or two hundred grand for the record, you're obviously not going to get very many points because they're taking the big risk. In our situation, we took the risk, so that's why we're asking for more.
I'm still in a situation where the only practice I get is when I'm playing professionally, when I'm either recording or touring with Joe. That's still something that drags me, and I took forward to either acquiring a place outside of New York at one point to be able to do that, or - if I'mever in New York long enough - get a stu-io where I can hang out. But it does take a lot of time toget a band off the ground. Since we last spoke in '94, I pretty much took off almost an entire year of work just to write the new record, get together with the guys, book the studio time, and take care of business. We recently hooked up with a manager, but up until now I've been doing everything for the band. It's taken up an awful lot of time, but it's been worth it because it's my baby. If it was a situation where it wasn't completely my band, there might have been less incentive. Don't misunderstand me: all three of us make up the band equally, but it is my group, so it's been worth the time and effort. And getting back together with Joe for this tour has really come at a good time because taking a year off of work and keeping up the sarne lifestyle in Manhattan as I did when I was working wasn't an inexpensive thing to do![laughs] And on top of not having an income, I was paying my band members because I wanted them to be able to concentrate on the band and not worry about making ends meet while we put everything together. Everybody pitched in what they had, and my pitch in was money. It's worked out good, and this tour with Joe came at a good time to get it all back up and running.
This new Starclassic kit I had designed custom - custom paint, customsizes, custom everything - for Einstein. It wasn't ready in time to record the CD, so I used my Artstar II's: a single kick and 8,10,12,14 sometimes, and 16, 18 toms. I wanted the big spread. This kit was actually ready shortly after the beginning of '96, right before we started on the big leg of the American tour. I drove down to Philadelphia with my brother just to set it up and have a look at it, and the minute I set it up I decided I wanted to start playing it to get a jump on playing a bigger kit again. I've gone back to playing left handed primarily. I've got two rides, depending on the sound I want, one on the right and one on the left. My main hi hat is set flat and to the left of my snare drum and I don't cross over anymore. I have a symmetrical cymbal set-up: from far left I've got a crash, a china, a ride cymbal, and a crash, with a hi-hat below, and a splash. The right side exactly mirrors that, the only difference being that I've got 12" closed x-hats in place of the splash. The drums are even
sizes: 6, 8,10,12,14 toms, 16 and 18 floors, plus a 20" gong bass drum with a
22" head on it. For every 2" increase in head size the toms increase 1" in
depth, so they run 7x6, 8x8, 9xl0, l0xl2, 1lxl4, and then 15xl6 and 16x18. The kicks are
16x24. My main snare is a standard Tama 5xl4 brass, and the one on the left is a maple
5xl4. I don't like most piccolos because of the way they feet: there's no air inside; the sound is really live; and I just don't like them. I like a high-end crack, but the piccolos get too much of a ping in their crack, and I don't like the sound of it. I use the left-hand snare a few times during the night, not for a piccolo sound but as a different-sounding main snare. I go over to it in "Ice 9," in "Cool #9," and during my solo. There's a double snare drum thing that I've been doing for years whenever I've had two snares set up that I've gotten back to doing again. I like the two drums
to be distinct, but not necessarily super-high and super-low. They're both pretty much
inthe same register, but different sounding. Stewart Copeland and Bill Bruford have
piccolo-sounding snare drums, but they're not piccolos; that's kind of what my left-hand
snare drum is like, whereas my main one has more of a Bonham type of sound. Before that I was using G1's on the whole kit, top and bottom. Real live, real open, and they sounded great, but I was changing them every night because of how hard I play, even though I probably could have gotten two or three shows out of them if I had backed off a little bit. In the studio I'd change them after everysong. So I decided to take
a chance and go with the ST's. They're single ply smooth white mylar, but they're
amazingly strong material - I can't dent them. The ST's I've been getting four and five
shows out of, and I'm still not really denting them, I'm just changing them for
consistency. They're really holding up great and they sound wonderful. Same
thing on the kick drums; the only one without the ST's is the gong bass, which gets the
thinnest head Evans makes, the Uno750. I change it every night. After one gig it's
cratered.
I wanted to get a lot deeper into what my groove was all about. Basically like Bonham, like the stuff he played in"The Crunge" or "The Ocean." Some of the grooves he bad were so hand-tailored for the songs. I never really looked into it that much until I started writing my own music. Then I realized how I could make or break a bass line, guitar run, or chord structure by doing so many different types of grooves. I wanted to concentrate more on playing my kit for the groove of the song rather than concentrating on using different voices, which I might have done in the past. So I opted to stay away from the eight little voices of the octobans and get a six and an eight up there as an integral part of my drum kit. I used them occasionally for grooves but mostly for fills, and I approached the songs in that fashion, which I really hadn't done before.
We got into the studio at Longview and spent an entire night with my engineer, Bob St. John - who did the whole record with rne - getting a great drum sound double-headed. Then everybody went to bed. I had wanted to go back to single-headed drums for three reasons: 1) I hate doing records with fantastic-sounding drums that get buried in the mix, and that happens eight out of ten times; 2) I absolutely love Phil Collins' drum sound and the old single-headed sound Simon Phillips got on his early records; and 3) I wanted to approach Einstein in a different way. I thought if I went back to single-headed drums, I would play the drum kit differently, and I definitely did. I felt my fills came out differently, and I approached my fills and how I accompanied Stan and Jane with their runs differently than I would have on a double-headed kit.
And you'll hear a
lot more of that with Einstein rather than the kind of playing I've done in the past with
Joe. A lot more complex stickings and a lot more polyrhythms came out because of the
increased definition in my sticking. He hated them during all those years he played them, and he said, "No, Jon, don't do it, please!" So I stayed away from them for a year, because I figured if Simon says don't do it, then don't do it! [laughs] But then when we were ready to do the Einstein record I couldn't resist. After we had set the kit up, miked the whole thing and got it on tape, it was four o'clock in the morning. I just couldn't sleep so I got up, snuck into the studio, took all the bottom heads off, taped up the lugs so they wouldn't buzz, and put all the microphones up inside the drums. Bob came in at about 10 a.m. and totally freaked out. He was very upset. He had never recorded a single-headed drum kit, and we had spent so much time the night before getting sounds that he was quite pissed off. I asked him to give
me five minutes and if he didn't like the way it sounded, I'd put the bottom heads back
on. I played for about 30 seconds and he came running out of the control room saying they
were the greatest sounding drums he had ever heard. You can get two tones out of a single-headed drum, depending on how you tune them.You get the old Rick Marotta/SteveGadd/early Simon Phillips sound, which is a very deep, low, right-to-the-point thud. Or you can get that PhilCollins/later Simon Phillips sound, which is a very bright, thin-but-articulate sound; that's what I wanted because I had the drums pretty tight. I didn't use the
six; I only used the 8, 10, 12, and sometimes the 14, so I really cranked them because I
wanted the 8 up there in the 6 range. If I had used fewer drums, I might have gone for the
deeper tone, but because I had three and four racks in front of me - and now I have five -
I tuned them much much higher. On so many sessions
tom toms are not audible because their frequencies get taken up by guitars or basses or
other instruments. I didn't have to worry about any of that with my drums on the Einstein
recording; everything came out loud and clear. I'd love to play both gigs single-headed, but I have to give more consideration to Joe's music than Einstein's for that five weeks. I've gotta think about what songs we'll be doing on that leg; if I can get away with a single-headed kit for both, I'll use this kit and cut holes in the bottom heads and leave about an inch all the way around, just enough to keep the hoop on the toms.
* Although a proponent of "smaller is better" for a number of yearsnow, in mid-tour Jonathan moved from his customary four-and five-piece kits to what can only be described as a drum set of cosmic proportions.
Used by permission Talking Drums |
[Home] [Articles] [A/V Clips] [Biography] [Contacts] [Discography] [einstein] |
[Forward] [Gear] [Links] [Merchandise] [News] [Photos] [Q&A] [Transcriptions] |
